Casper NIRVANA

Performance Results


Gaming 130% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 130% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	CASPER CASPER NIRVANA
Motherboard	Casper NIRVANA (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190509
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '21 at 12:29
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$294 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 160 2-Core 319 104% 192 Pts	4-Core 644 8-Core 1,178 109% 911 Pts	64-Core 1568 97% 1568 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 4001) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	119% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 154 Parallax 155 128% 155 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 132 Splatting 117 116% 146 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 439 457 455 457 458 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 341 Write 406 Mixed 352 SusWrite 427 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 35.9 132% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 202 178% 263 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 102%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 186 186 186 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 188 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 184 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB 9,626 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 29.4 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 46 SC Mixed 31.7 94% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NIRVANA Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Casper NIRVANA

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	93x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	84x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	171x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	63x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x

RAM
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 45%, 1,309 samples	50x
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 26%, 640 samples	25x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 36%, 3,530 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $105

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16