Acer Aspire A515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Calla_RN
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 14:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 276
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 755
82% 648 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 1461) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.40
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 15
Parallax 20.2
5% 13.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 913 932 661 568 598 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 934
Mixed 863
SusWrite 759
194% 858 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 61.1
168% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 529
458% 677 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 169%
Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-44 Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback