Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 12:18
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 61
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 815
75% 628 Pts
64-Core 1743
108% 1743 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 122
Parallax 143
119% 137 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 112
115% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 970 1093 1141 1185 1168 1165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,468
Write 1,262
Mixed 1,250
SusWrite 1,120
338% 1,525 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 38.1
136% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 300
234% 339 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 225%
Great: 393%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
69GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 101 119 116 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 145
Write 133
Mixed 137
SusWrite 116
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 21.7
81% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 144
107% 143 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
301GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 406 416 428 427 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 391
Mixed 422
SusWrite 412
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 36.1
123% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 261
197% 270 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
197GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 68 67 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 51
Write 53.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 67.1
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
546GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 70 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 75.6
Write 57.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 67.1
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 35.5
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 20
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback