Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 11:06
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 180
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 289
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 62.1
54% 65.3 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 62.9
54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 102 21 54 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 332
Write 259
Mixed 245
SusWrite 88.2
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 12.9
41% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 39.5
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 28.1
27% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 58%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
218GB free
Firmware: MKAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 70 87 81 73 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 76.9
Write 75.8
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 82
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 163 166 164 164 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
776GB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 145 146 150 151 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 144 145 147 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 143
Write 160
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 145
184% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
180% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-053.A00LF 1352 SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback