MSI A68HM-E33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 22:23
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 130
59% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 16.8
15% 19.6 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 15.4
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 99 40 40 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 426
Write 345
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 54.5
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 94%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
256GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 90.1
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 86.1
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter Atermiter 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback