Virtuozzo KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemVirtuozzo KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 22:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 23.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
60% 124 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 921
81% 691 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu Vz HARDDISK0 429GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 335 334 352 305 278 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 42% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 87.1
MC Mixed 90.2
216% 75.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 298
13% 298 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 176%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback