Acer Aspire E1-772G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA70_HW
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 117
54% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 232
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0821) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.83 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS240G 240GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 120 127 108 119 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 418
Write 376
Mixed 316
SusWrite 136
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 30.3
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 138
133% 210 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-772G Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback