Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 21:53
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 66.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 973
88% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,293
80% 1,293 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1610 MHz, MLim: 810 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 110
Parallax 165
89% 128 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 117
Splatting 76.8
76% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 60GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0707A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 315
Write 67.2
Mixed 104
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 10.3
80% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 49.3
48% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 72%
Patriot Burst 240GB
185GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 81 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 471
Write 264
Mixed 322
SusWrite 128
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 36.2
151% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 196
168% 245 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 94%
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1933 1479 1522 1526 1524 1523 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,824
SusWrite 1,584
424% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 71.5
249% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,183
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 1,025
763% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 300%
Great: 334%
3 480GB SSD 480GB
69GB free
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 407 406 415 236 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 415
Mixed 395
SusWrite 320
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 32.9
147% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 50.4
93% 181 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 101%
Asmedia ASM105x 2TB
100GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 122 133 140 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 182
Write 119
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 127
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
305% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 86%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
101GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 92.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 55
86% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$59
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback