Lenovo 90Q10037MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90Q10037MH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3728
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 857
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 105
Parallax 108
91% 108 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 91.7
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MEE1OWX 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0Q0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 329 324 322 321 321 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 1,164
Mixed 1118
SusWrite 395
244% 1,100 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 80.8
282% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 939
DQ Mixed 284
372% 662 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 218%
Great: 210%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0209
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 38.1
Mixed 38
8% 38 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 12.7
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 15.1
12% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
197GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 22.2
8% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 14.6
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 17.2
13% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 19%
Great: 134%
ASMT 2115 1TB
321GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 34
Write 16.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 19.6
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 29.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q10037MH Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 90Q10037MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback