Biostar A10N-9830E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9830E  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 11:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 117
52% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 184
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1CC0) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 13.4
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 7.6
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 292 302 123 263 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.7% Good
Read 266
Write 59.8
Mixed 146
SusWrite 239
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 22.3
95% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 168
134% 186 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2344WH.001 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-9830E Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9830E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $46
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback