Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 07:28
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 1039
93% 786 Pts
64-Core 1482
92% 1482 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 192
Parallax 183
149% 186 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 190
Splatting 127
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
477GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 460 460 461 463 463 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 454
Mixed 404
SusWrite 444
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 48.2
164% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 204
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Crucial MTFDDAV480TCB 480GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D0DE012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 387 389 390 392 392 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.6% Excellent
Read 403
Write 389
Mixed 273
SusWrite 378
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 33.4
129% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 204
153% 203 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 460 460 461 463 315 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 437
Mixed 429
SusWrite 420
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 51.9
180% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 205
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 256GB
177GB free, PID fa05, PNY Elite Turbo
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.7
Write 80.8
Mixed 57.1
92% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 33.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback