Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3099-A1
Memory	43 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190624
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '21 at 22:19
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 0 77 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 47.8 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 163 53% 97.8 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 593 54% 456 Pts	64-Core 1,506 93% 1,506 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.3% Below average	Lighting 52 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 47.3 42% 51.4 fps	MRender 41.3 Gravity 48.4 Splatting 0.1 22% 29.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 898GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 765GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 506 500 412 523 396 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 866 Write 732 Mixed 844 SusWrite 472 164% 729 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 20.2 80% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 46 DQ Mixed 72.7 68% 111 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 130%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB 30,033 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 763GB free Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 1115 1083 428 307 512 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 967 Write 1,148 Mixed 991 SusWrite 755 218% 965 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 22.1 74% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 22.6 DQ Mixed 56.1 61% 108 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 305%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129 374 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 174 143 180 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 182 Mixed 78.6 SusWrite 163 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 307% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70QB0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 48GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 24.9 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.2 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2407 01stBench 49%, 63 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 01stBench 58%, 75 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1x

SSD
PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 41%, 2,811 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5170EH1- M393B1K70DH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5170EH1- 32GBSamsungBench 30%, 1 sample	1x
M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 415 samples	1x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16