bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1390 x 708 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 15:58
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 176
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 696
60% 512 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 48 27 32 48 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 225
Write 69.9
Mixed 216
SusWrite 44
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 3
23% 7.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 204
142% 176 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 83%
Vmware Virtual disk 752GB
450GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 92 61 69 107 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 145
Write 181
Mixed 235
SusWrite 89.9
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 8.1
29% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 126
92% 119 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 74%
Vmware Virtual disk 752GB
497GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 88 56 68 103 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 82%
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
197GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 89 56 68 104 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 128 slots used
64GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 66.9
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 58.1
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 143%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback