Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 191
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 632
63% 513 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 194
Parallax 191
150% 189 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 189
Splatting 127
122% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 241 241 241 241 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.2% Good
Read 250
Write 238
Mixed 232
SusWrite 241
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 33.2
99% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 21.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback