Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '21 at 01:44
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 93.9 48% 74.1 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 237 27% 213 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 04D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 55.6 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 68.5 45% 62.1 fps	MRender 53.9 Gravity 50.2 Splatting 37.3 38% 47.1 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra II 1TB 900 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 892GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 155 163 168 168 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 338 Write 322 Mixed 212 SusWrite 159 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 31.6 109% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 83.5 DQ Mixed 37.1 34% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 109%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 931GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 160 164 169 170 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 346 Write 328 Mixed 285 SusWrite 163 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 41 134% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 51.3 42% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-149.A00LF 4x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 533 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16