Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 56 1-Core 19.4 2-Core 37.9 27% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 35.8 8-Core 36.7 5% 36.2 Pts	64-Core 38 2% 38 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 054A) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605A SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 100 100 110 111 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 180 Write 146 Mixed 162 SusWrite 107 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 16.2 53% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 90.9 DQ Mixed 125 88% 111 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16