Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JA
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 59 1-Core 133 2-Core 221 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 460 52% 409 Pts	64-Core 461 28% 461 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	8.55% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 11.8 8% 9.87 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 12 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.55% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 560 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 919 924 931 930 929 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 790 Write 934 Mixed 772 SusWrite 908 192% 851 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 43.2 155% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 616 DQ Mixed 398 319% 436 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 192%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 6,259 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 21.9 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 22.1 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	310x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	213x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	37x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	523x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	37x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	74x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	49x
HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GBNvmeBench 128%, 3,461 samples	29x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	181x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	119x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16