Asus P5K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 21:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 54.1
38% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12.6
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST3750330AS 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 106 99 96 99 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 240
Write 227
Mixed 152
SusWrite 106
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 30
107% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 35.9
32% 47.9 MB/s
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
156GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 87.7
Write 88.9
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 70.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.6
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback