Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200514
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '21 at 00:03
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 128 2-Core 167 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 165 22% 163 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Device(7377 150A) ≥ 4GB; RTX 3060 Ultra W OC 12G-V CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.7% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 107 Parallax 113 98% 114 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 96 Splatting 65.4 76% 97.6 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900E13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 74 95 34 107 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.3% Poor	Read 199 Write 99.1 Mixed 91.9 SusWrite 97.1 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 8.5 49% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 24.5 DQ Mixed 22.4 18% 24 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 96%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9 10 8.6 9.8 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 18 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 10.1 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2.6 214% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4W.M8FE1 2x8GB 1,349 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 34.1 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 31.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B550M DS3H Builds (Compare 7,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,670x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,331x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	900x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	671x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	527x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	483x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	190x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	146x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	138x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	418x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	256x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	223x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $533

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16