| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Samsung Samsung DeskTop System (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_DT1234567890 |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140702 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '21 at 11:02 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.2%
Below average
|
26% 38.4 Pts
|
22% 191 Pts
|
17% 277 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D B096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
|
2.84%
Terrible
|
2% 3.3 fps
|
3% 4.13 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 214 315 316 346 387 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
80% 356 MB/s
|
60% 17.4 MB/s
|
154% 185 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
44.6%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
24% 165 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,769 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 229x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 185x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 106x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 243x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 151x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |