HP Engage One Pro AIO System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Engage One Pro AIO System  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 874F
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 720 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 08:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 197
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 545
54% 444 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 874F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.6
5% 6 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 277 244 273 300 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 820
Write 831
Mixed 292
SusWrite 306
125% 562 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 25
104% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 390
307% 425 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 180%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Engage One Pro AIO System Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Engage One Pro AIO System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback