Hyrican PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHyrican PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 168
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 264
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7A36) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 10.4
7% 8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 66 117 128 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69% Good
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 101
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69%
Great: 87%
55GB free, PID fafa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 21.2
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC Builds (Compare 643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Hyrican PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback