To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-6657
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 05:00
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 62
36% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 58.6
8-Core 60
8% 59.3 Pts
64-Core 62
4% 62 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION
MSI(1462 4570) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.9038
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.2 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 74 80 83 81 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 74
Write 81.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 80.2
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HYMP125S64CP8-S6 HYMP112S64CP6-S6 3GB
2048, 2048 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback