Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990XA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 23:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 99.7
52% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 289
29% 238 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 55 127 32 45 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 121
Write 79
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 66.9
19% 85 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 8.7
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 96.2
70% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
597GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 128 139 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 115
Write 101
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 131
70% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
611GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 102 104 105 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 102
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Dark-1600 Dark-1600 12GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback