Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Memory 22.9 1-Core 18 2-Core 34.1 16% 25 Pts	4-Core 34.2 8-Core 35.1 5% 34.7 Pts	64-Core 38.4 2% 38.4 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908D) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.42% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.77 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.42% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 250 244 249 248 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 294 Write 322 Mixed 231 SusWrite 250 62% 274 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 16.4 60% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 90.1 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 84.4 63% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 383GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 71 75 72 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 75.3 Write 65.9 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 72.9 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.5 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 300 13% 300 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6320 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 39 samples	1x

RAM
KRE-D3S1600M/4G 1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 30 samples	1x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GBElpidaBench 30%, 8 samples	1x
SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 403 samples	1x