Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 05:37
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 159
2-Core 315
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 903
94% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 500GB
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 1095 488 491 488 488 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: U210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 372 377 376 374 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 304
Write 378
Mixed 225
SusWrite 374
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 15
85% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 64
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 69
67% 103 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
335GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 176
Write 175
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 126
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 112%
Fujitsu MHZ2120B 120GB-$40
112GB free
Firmware: 0081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 19.4
Write 52.6
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 56.3
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 28.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 29.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback