Acer Aspire E5-574G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-574G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Zoro_SL
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170525
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 03:20
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 48%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 103
46% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 162
24% 172 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 100C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.9
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YGC-SA3-512G 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 257 184 287 227 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
Read 436
Write 326
Mixed 328
SusWrite 163
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.1
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 0.4
11% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-574G Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-574G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback