Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '21 at 03:02
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9350KF-$180 1,442 User benchmarks, average bench 89% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 265 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 439 59% 440 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8423) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 26.7 Parallax 31.3 18% 26.8 fps	MRender 32.7 Gravity 28.6 Splatting 24.2 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB 2,162 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0519A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 14 101 17 40 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 373 Write 182 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 49.6 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 0.4 12% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.2% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 13.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,072x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	932x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	300x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	158x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16