HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 198
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 591
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (75 fps cap detected)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 75
Parallax 75
2% 50.6 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 75
Splatting 75
61% 75 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VK3840GFDKN 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 396 396 401 401 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 427
Write 393
Mixed 338
SusWrite 399
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 33
111% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 151
150% 244 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 38.3
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback