Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 11:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 114
53% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 200
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S350
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.1 2.9 4.9 4.9 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.7% Poor
Read 235
Write 7.5
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 15.5
14% 67 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 4
37% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
25GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 3.9 4.2 4.2 4.5 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 18.6
Write 8.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 4.9
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.5
166% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback