NEC EASYNOTE PB47R01104

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemNEC EASYNOTE PB47R01104  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC K2W
Memory1.3 GB free of 0.500488 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 09:37
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.80GHz
uFCBGA, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Memory 47.7
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 16.7
22% 27.2 Pts
4-Core 17.5
8-Core 17.3
2% 17.4 Pts
64-Core 16.9
1% 16.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST980811A 80GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 37 36 37 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 22.1
Write 33
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 35.1
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 33GB
null MHz
512, 33280 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback