Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 32% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 25 2-Core 43.6 30% 42 Pts	4-Core 41.3 8-Core 37.8 5% 39.5 Pts	64-Core 44.2 3% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3600 11 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PowerColor(148C 2303) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.3 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.6 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 141 139 147 199 217 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 169 Write 162 Mixed 157 SusWrite 160 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 20.9 70% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 41 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 53.5 42% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16