Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 22:46
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 95.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 479 58% 448 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 116 Parallax 98.8 92% 109 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 98.4 82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 288GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4303 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1709 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 43 (AE) Unknown 100 100 463 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 48 223339479069 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 28165198719 (F7) Unknown 100 100 883896696 (F8) Unknown 100 100 540340239	91.9% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 465 Mixed 461 106% 477 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 24.1 113% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 39.3 80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8477 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1050 (B1) Unknown 97 97 43 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 734 (EB) Unknown 99 99 124 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20806853696	92.4% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 401 Mixed 409 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 39.6 144% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 43.4 DQ Write 91.7 DQ Mixed 25.1 31% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 187 170 5650 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 308 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2749 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 303 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 286 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12426 (C2) HDA temperature 117 105 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77% Very good	Read 128 Write 141 Mixed 129 100% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.28 113% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 865GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 182 182 34380448059 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1103 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 117 117 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9301 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1075 (C0) Power-off retract count 88 88 15502 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 15502 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 223339544616 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	86.5% Excellent	Read 176 Write 126 Mixed 135 109% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 466GB free Firmware: CC4D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 88 171471584 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3255 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1056 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 176493021256 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 24619 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3162 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 11118 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 605945892 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 553 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 39011 (C2) HDA temperature 36 48 73014444068 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 99 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -138929307103206 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -125426292776330 (F2) Unknown 100 253 97548456813322	90.5% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 138 Mixed 142 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.31 81% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70% Very good	MC Read 25 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 22.2 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 21.7 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 54.5 73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V DELUXE Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	456x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	159x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	98x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	28x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	27x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	40x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $387

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16