Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc7800p Ultra-slim Desktop (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AA4h
Memory	2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070718
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 20:54
Run Duration	69 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$20 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 47.9 32% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 48.1 8-Core 39.7 6% 43.9 Pts	64-Core 39.6 2% 39.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 43%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63 12,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 222 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 182 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 74 (AD) Unknown 100 100 262153 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 40 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 96 (F1) Unknown 100 100 683	38.5% Below average	Read 237 Write 167 Mixed 169 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 7.65 60% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 8.16 15% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 40GB 7,939 User benchmarks, average bench 22% null MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16