Acer TravelMate P253

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer TravelMate P253  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA51_HC_CR
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131007
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 22:14
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 120
50% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 166
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.57 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R240GB 240GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 111 47 22 7.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 311
Write 337
Mixed 190
SusWrite 71.9
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11.4
DQ Write 3.4
DQ Mixed 0.3
2% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P253 Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P253

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback