TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory242.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 06:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 617
54% 462 Pts
64-Core 2,343
145% 2,343 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 66.6%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 74.1
44% 62.5 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 49.6
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 45.3%
 Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T1R0A 1TB
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 404 396 400 394 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 440
Write 382
Mixed 254
SusWrite 401
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 28.2
120% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 183
158% 233 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 89.7%
 Great: 96%
VK0480GDPVT 480GB
50GB free
Firmware: HPS5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 310 309 308 309 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 376
Write 340
Mixed 304
SusWrite 310
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 226
167% 220 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 78%
 Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD 36KSF2G72P... 256GB
1333, 1866, 1333, 1866, 1866, 1333, 1866, 1333, 1333, 1866, 1333, 1866, 1866, 1333, 1866, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 55.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 31
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 94.5%
 Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples87x
GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples146x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples67x
SSD
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples55x
860 1TBSamsungBench 86%, 2,531 samples38x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples32x
RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples19x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback