Packard EasyNote_MX65

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Packard EasyNote_MX65 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote_MX65
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070303
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '21 at 22:51
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5500-$18 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 64.8 1-Core 18.5 2-Core 37.7 30% 40.3 Pts	4-Core 34.9 8-Core 35.4 5% 35.2 Pts	64-Core 35.2 2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300 116 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(1631 C022) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 307.68 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.2 Parallax 0.1 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00M256GB 256GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1211A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 28 22 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.4% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 28.8 Mixed 29 SusWrite 27.1 6% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 8.5 36% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 13.4 DQ Write 20.1 DQ Mixed 10.9 10% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 80%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB 1,724 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 8003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.6 2.6 3.1 3.2 3 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3 6% 6.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16