| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1631 |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161027 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 27 '17 at 23:25 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.2%
Above average
|
58% 95.2 Pts
|
23% 178 Pts
|
13% 209 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
CLim: 717 MHz, MLim: 540 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.48
|
3.69%
Terrible
|
4% 4.2 fps
|
4% 4.96 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53.3%
Above average
|
68% 89.9 MB/s
|
34% 0.35 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
|
50%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
56% 71 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 466 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8560w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples | 91x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 77x |
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 64x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples | 287x |
| Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples | 126x |
| FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $258 |