Asus UX31E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus UX31E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX31E
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 14:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2677M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 90.9
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 120
61% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 158
23% 166 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1427) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 445 456 447 342 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 445
Write 432
Mixed 420
SusWrite 388
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 31.3
102% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX31E Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX31E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback