HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory1.3 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 09:38
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 83.8
45% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 82.9
11% 83.1 Pts
64-Core 84.1
5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 30 53 60 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 64
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 58.4
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 38GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback