Acer Aspire X3960

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X3960  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3960
Memory10.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110117
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 09:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 21,349,182 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 83.3
46% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 152
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Sapphire(174B 2162) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 64 70 66 86 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 55.9
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 79.5
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 74%
ST332082 0AS 320GB
186GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 19.4
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 22
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3960 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3960

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback