TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 21:38
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 476
64% 475 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 88.8%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3746)
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.2
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 28.7%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRW250GB 250GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 123 7.7 7.5 8.2 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.1% Poor
Read 265
Write 211
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 43.2
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 65.4
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 0.4
10% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 25.1%
 Great: 98%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
179GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 189 127 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 231
Write 102
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 139
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 18.9
71% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 35
26% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 41%
 Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 19
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 60.2%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples447x
Core i7-2600KIntel  $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples359x
Core i7-2600Intel  $133Bench 67%, 185,630 samples200x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples104x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples96x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples47x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples33x
RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples24x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback