Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 270u 27 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 29 2-Core 57.8 38% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 57 8-Core 57 8% 57 Pts	64-Core 58.5 4% 58.5 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 1.8 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 75 67 83 80 78 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.9% Poor	Read 200 Write 104 Mixed 120 SusWrite 72.8 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 12.2 36% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 55%
Hitachi HCS5C1025CLA382 250GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 225GB free Firmware: JC1OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 104 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 107 Write 109 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 106 68% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16