HP Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3648h
Memory0.5 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 43
2-Core 84.6
44% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 86
8-Core 79.8
11% 82.9 Pts
64-Core 84.5
5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3648)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 46 55 33 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 68.8
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 39.2
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback