Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 48.8 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 97.3 38% 64.6 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 122 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R7 200 Dual Graphics 214 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(1642 3D79) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 10 6% 8.73 fps	MRender 7.5 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 6.1 6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S600 240GB 1,240 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04C0B107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 186 214 27 148 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 388 Write 284 Mixed 213 SusWrite 144 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 22.3 45% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 120 96% 133 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 902GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 201 204 204 200 202 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 157 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 202 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2.6 444% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD38G16002 2x8GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 12.5 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7.8 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16