Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 11:14
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 175
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 483
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 207 209 208 208 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 349
Write 269
Mixed 226
SusWrite 206
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 13.8
78% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 47.3
68% 125 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 86%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
552GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1768 1742 1742 1733 1737 1805 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,692
Write 1588
Mixed 1625
SusWrite 1,754
376% 1,665 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 54.1
154% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 370
310% 464 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 246%
Great: 347%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 97
SusWrite 120
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback