Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 05:41
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 207
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 754
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 62.1
52% 64.6 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 61.6
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 887 887 889 866 866 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,195
Write 1,967
Mixed 1,541
SusWrite 920
370% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 85.5
271% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 695
520% 694 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 260%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
410GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 471 473 474 434 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 430
Mixed 417
SusWrite 438
99% 437 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 48.9
163% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 96 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 78.8
Write 81.8
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 94.3
55% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 60%
FCR-HS3 -0 64GB
54GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 71.7
Mixed 64.5
97% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.2
161% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 47%
FCR-HS3 -1 64GB
58GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 82.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 75.7
96% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.4
295% 5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 30
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback