Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 2,292 User benchmarks, average bench 70% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 122 61% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 339 36% 286 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V3800 (FireGL V) 260 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 210A) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 4.9 4% 4.73 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 4.2 3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 85 85 97 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 324 Write 100 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 89.8 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 12.6 62% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 86.7 DQ Write 63.1 DQ Mixed 70.7 54% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 6GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.2 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 10.9 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	83x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	12x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	12x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $211