Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 351 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.9% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 8.9 6% 7.07 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.9% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 240GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0130B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 112 4.4 18 50 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 488 Write 175 Mixed 328 SusWrite 47.6 57% 260 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 18 113% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 84.6 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 21.6 69% 142 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 181GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 153 149 154 151 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 144 Write 138 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 151 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	222x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	216x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	114x

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $331