HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '21 at 03:27
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 181 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 359 45% 340 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 37.9 30% 38.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 26.9 27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 296 306 308 308 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 449 Mixed 419 SusWrite 303 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 37.9 125% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 363 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 129%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 210GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 100 102 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 99.1 69% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 98%
Hitachi HUH728080ALE601 8TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 180GB free Firmware: A4GNV7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 123 123 123 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 147 Write 149 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 122 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 112%
WD My Book 25DA 3TB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 261GB free, PID 25da Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 22.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 7 26% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 107GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 22.9 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 7.1 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 2.3 193% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 103%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 23.4 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 7.1 27% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 2.2 192% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 107%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 113GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 23.1 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 7.1 27% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 2.3 192% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 103%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 330GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 32 Write 23.1 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 7.1 27% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 2.1 188% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 103%
WD easystore 264D 16TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 440GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 23.8 Write 23 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 7.1 26% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 2.1 257% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,043x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	970x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	402x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	382x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16